Psychology Classics On Amazon
Hybristophilia: The Psychology Behind
Attraction to Criminals
Introduction
Hybristophilia (also known as Bonnie and Clyde syndrome) is defined in psychology as a sexual or romantic attraction to individuals who have committed crimes, especially violent or outrageous crimes. The term, coined by sexologist John Money in 1986, refers to a predatory-type paraphilia wherein a person is “sexuoerotically turned on only by a partner who has a predatory history of outrages perpetrated on others”. In other words, the knowledge of a partner’s criminal violence is the source of arousal. While relatively rare, hybristophilia is highly relevant to both forensic and social psychology. It sits at the intersection of abnormal attraction and criminal behavior, raising questions about why some individuals develop affection for convicted violent offenders. Studying hybristophilia is significant because it can illuminate the psychological mechanisms of attraction to danger, influence how criminals are managed (since some attract devoted followers), and reveal how media coverage of notorious criminals might foster “serial killer groupies.” This article provides a multidisciplinary examination of hybristophilia, drawing on psychological theories, criminological case studies, and sociocultural analysis. It will explore the possible causes and mechanisms behind hybristophilia, discuss notable cases and their forensic implications, examine the influence of media and popular culture, consider ethical and legal issues, and evaluate whether hybristophilia should be treated or viewed as a clinical concern. Throughout, the discussion is grounded in peer-reviewed research and expert analyses to ensure a critical, evidence-based perspective.
Psychological Foundations
Understanding hybristophilia requires exploring several psychological theories and factors that might contribute to this unusual attraction. Researchers emphasize that no single cause explains hybristophilia; rather, multiple psychological and biological mechanisms likely interact. Below are some key theoretical perspectives:
- Attachment and Early Experiences: One hypothesis is that hybristophilia can stem from dysfunctional attachment patterns or past trauma in relationships. Some individuals who develop attractions to criminals have histories of abuse or neglect, which may influence their adult romantic preferences. In a review of hybristophiles, Vitello (2006) found many were “often insecure, have low self-esteem [and] have often been victims of physical and sexual abuse,” potentially making them more vulnerable to deviant relationships. For example, interviews with women who fell in love with convicted murderers revealed that many had been in prior abusive relationships. Paradoxically, these women reported feeling safer with a partner who is behind bars – since the man’s incarceration means he cannot directly harm them, the women retain a sense of control in the relationship. Attachment theory would suggest that an insecure or anxious attachment style, formed in childhood, might dispose someone to seek intense, even dangerous partners in an effort to find love and validation. A criminal partner behind bars may also offer a form of “safe intimacy” (an intimate connection without typical day-to-day cohabitation pressures), which can unconsciously comfort those with fear of abandonment or past trauma. Essentially, early experiences of chaos or abuse might normalize high-risk, dramatic relationships, setting the stage for attraction to violent individuals.
- Personality Factors and Psychopathology: Psychologists have also examined whether certain personality traits or disorders are common among hybristophiles. There is no singular profile, but some patterns emerge. Many admirers of criminals appear to have a dependent or empathetic personality, drawn to the rescue fantasy of “saving” or reforming a damaged person. Others may have traits of idealization and delusion, becoming fixated on an imagined persona of the criminal rather than the reality. Vitello’s research noted that while a number of hybristophiliac women had victimization in their past, not all did – some “simply want to sublimate their violent tendencies by collaborating with a perpetrator of violence”. This suggests a few individuals might themselves have aggressive or thrill-seeking tendencies and find an outlet through association with a violent partner. Importantly, most hybristophiles are not diagnosably psychotic or disordered in a clinical sense; they often function normally in society aside from their extreme romantic interests. Some experts caution against hastily pathologizing these individuals, as intense attraction to a “bad boy” can exist on a spectrum from normal fascination to maladaptive obsession. Overall, personality factors like low self-worth, high need for attention, or thrill-seeking can contribute to hybristophilia, especially in the absence of healthier relationship models.
- Psychosexual Development and Conditioning: Another explanation lies in how sexual preferences form. Psychosexual development theories propose that early life experiences and fantasies can shape later arousal patterns. The archetype of the “sexy bad boy” is a prevalent cultural trope, and for some, this trope becomes erotically charged during adolescence. If a teenager develops a pattern of equating danger or rule-breaking with sexual excitement, they may carry that association into adulthood. As one author noted, “the sexy bad boy is a staple American icon… those who do not grow out of the bad-boy fixation become a hybristophile because the image is so strongly paired with sexual arousal”. In technical terms, classical conditioning can link fear or taboo with arousal. John Money suggested an “opponent-process” mechanism in paraphilias: initially frightening stimuli can, through repeated exposure in a certain context, trigger an opposite reaction of pleasure. This means that the adrenaline rush or anxiety one might feel about a lover’s dangerous reputation could gradually convert into sexual excitement. The criminal partner becomes the conditioned stimulus for both fear and arousal, effectively mixing those feelings. Indeed, hybristophilia has been compared to the thrill of a roller coaster – what starts as terror floods into euphoria once the person learns they are safe despite the danger. Thus, a woman watching a high-profile killer in court may feel intense fear and excitement, but in the controlled environment (with the killer in shackles and guards present) that fear becomes titillating rather than truly threatening. Psychological research on excitation transfer supports this: residual arousal from fear can intensify attraction in the right circumstances. This may explain reports of individuals finding notorious killers “charming” or “attractive” during trials, as happened with Ted Bundy, who was often described as charismatic by his female followers. In sum, through a combination of cultural socialization (the bad-boy mystique) and conditioning (fear converting to arousal), a predisposition for eroticizing crime can develop during one’s psychosexual development.
- Evolutionary Psychology Perspectives: Some scholars have speculated about possible evolutionary underpinnings of hybristophilia, although these ideas remain theoretical. One notion is that certain women might unconsciously perceive aggressive, notorious men as “alpha” mates whose offspring could inherit advantageous traits for survival. From this perspective, a violent criminal could be seen (at a primal instinct level) as someone with strength, dominance, or fearless genes. While counterintuitive in modern terms, in an ancestral environment such traits might have correlated with protection or access to resources – thus a hardwired attraction to bold, risk-taking males could exist. Another evolutionary angle is the idea of female mate choice for high-status outliers: a famous criminal, however negative his fame, is still a known figure, and being attached to him grants a certain social notoriety. This could appeal to a drive for raising one’s social standing or securing a mate who stands out from other males. Additionally, researchers have posited that hybristophiles may have elevated nurturing instincts or “maternal” drives that get directed in a maladaptive way. The desire to “nurture or reform” a dangerous man – essentially to tame the beast – might be an exaggerated offshoot of evolved caregiving behaviors. Evolutionary psychology also considers sex differences: hybristophilia is reported far more often in women than men, which invites questions about gendered evolutionary strategies. Women historically might pursue men with high status (even if that status comes from infamy), whereas men might be less inclined to seek out criminal women as mates. Indeed, cases of male hybristophiles are quite rare, though they do exist (for instance, a documented case where male admirers fell under the sway of a female serial killer). Overall, evolutionary explanations remain speculative and must be balanced with social learning, but they provide one lens suggesting that attraction to notorious, high-risk partners could have deep-rooted psychological motivations.
- Neurobiological and Hormonal Factors: While direct neurological research on hybristophilia is lacking (due to its rarity), we can extrapolate from related phenomena. The role of adrenaline and arousal has already been mentioned – fear can trigger the release of adrenaline and endorphins, creating a physiological “high” that some may then seek out sexually. Neuroimaging studies of people with paraphilias show that atypical sexual stimuli can activate reward centers in the brain, much like normative sexual stimuli do. It is plausible that for hybristophiliacs, hearing about or witnessing a lover’s violent exploits triggers dopamine release and heightened arousal in the brain’s pleasure circuits. Hormonal factors might also play a role. For example, some women experience increased attraction to dominant or edgy men during certain phases of the menstrual cycle (linked to higher testosterone or ovulatory effects), though this is usually mild. In hybristophilia, any such effect would be extreme. One could hypothesize that a hybristophile’s endocrine responses to stress and arousal (cortisol, adrenaline, oxytocin) become intertwined in a way that reinforces attraction to dangerous individuals. Though hard evidence is scant, the general psychological principle is that arousal is arousal – the body’s physiological excitement can be labeled as fear or sexual desire depending on context. Thus, the brain chemistry of someone writing love letters to a killer might resemble the chemistry of someone on a thrilling, risky adventure. Future neurological research may shed more light, but current understanding emphasizes psychological conditioning and social factors over any singular “hybristophilia hormone.”
The psychological foundations of hybristophilia appear to involve a mix of early experiences (attachment and trauma), personality dynamics, learned associations between danger and desire, and perhaps some biologically driven thrill-seeking. It is a complex picture, and as several authors note, much of what we know is based on case studies and theory rather than large-scale empirical studies. This sets the stage for how these psychological elements manifest in real-world scenarios involving criminals and those attracted to them.
Mugshot of former member of the Manson Family, Ruth Ann Smith (more commonly known as Ruth Ann Moorehouse).
Criminological and Forensic Psychology Aspects
Hybristophilia has important implications in criminology and forensic psychology, particularly evident in numerous high-profile criminal cases. A striking pattern has been observed: some of the world’s most notorious violent criminals have attracted followings of admirers, predominantly women, who profess love, sexual attraction, or devotion despite knowing the heinous crimes these men committed. From a forensic standpoint, studying these cases provides insight into how hybristophilia operates and how it might affect criminal justice processes.
Notable Cases: Perhaps the most famous example is Ted Bundy, a serial killer who, during his 1979–1980 trials, had an avid crowd of young female spectators. Bundy received love letters in jail and even married one of his admirers in the courtroom during his Florida trial (taking advantage of a law that allowed a marriage declaration in court). Bundy’s wife had become infatuated with him while he was incarcerated, and she later bore his child – a case that epitomizes hybristophilia in action. Similarly, Richard Ramirez, the “Night Stalker” serial killer, garnered numerous female groupies after his arrest. Women sent him erotic photos and letters, and one superfan, Doreen Lioy, eventually married him in prison in 1996. Cult leader and murderer Charles Manson also had no shortage of admirers: even decades into his imprisonment, he became engaged to a 26-year-old woman who had been writing to him and campaigning for his release. These men – Bundy, Ramirez, Manson – are often cited as archetypal cases where the criminal’s notoriety and charisma sparked romantic obsession in certain followers. Even Jeffrey Dahmer, who committed gruesome murders, reportedly received amorous fan mail from women after his crimes became public. The phenomenon is not limited to serial killers: other criminals, like mobsters, cult leaders, or spree killers, have also drawn inexplicable affection. For instance, school shooters and terrorists have been known to attract online fans (the Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev had teenage girls calling themselves “Mrs. Tsarnaev” on social media). These case studies illustrate the range of criminals that can inspire hybristophilia – often those who are high-profile, portrayed extensively in media, and who project a confident or intriguing persona.
Passive vs. Aggressive Hybristophiles: Forensic psychologists differentiate between passive and active (or aggressive) hybristophilia. In passive hybristophilia, individuals are attracted to criminals but do not wish to participate in crime themselves. These are the “prison groupies” or “serial killer groupies” who may write letters, visit or flirt with inmates, but confine their involvement to admiration at a distance. They often harbor the fantasy that “I alone truly understand this person” and may rationalize the criminal’s actions, believing, for example, “He’d never hurt me, he only hurt others”. They sometimes see the good in the offender that no one else sees, or feel special and chosen due to the attention the criminal gives them. In contrast, aggressive hybristophilia involves those who not only love criminals, but also actively help or encourage the criminal in their wrongdoing. These individuals cross from mere fantasy into criminal complicity. Historical examples include women who have aided serial killer boyfriends by luring victims or covering up crimes. A classic case is Caril Ann Fugate, the 14-year-old girlfriend of spree killer Charles Starkweather in the 1950s, who accompanied him during a murderous rampage (though Fugate’s level of voluntariness is debated). Another example is the Manson Family women – followers of Charles Manson who were so devoted to him that they carried out brutal murders at his behest. Such women exemplify aggressive hybristophiliacs: their sexual or emotional attraction is intertwined with direct participation in crime. As one description notes, these partners “help out their lovers with the criminal agenda by luring victims, hiding bodies, or even committing crimes”, all the while convincing themselves it’s for love or that they won’t be harmed by their partner. Both passive and aggressive hybristophiliacs often end up in abusive, dysfunctional relationships, and in the aggressive type the relationship dynamic can be deadly for others.
Influence on Criminal Behavior and Profiling: The existence of hybristophilia can actually play a role in criminal behavior itself. Some criminals knowingly exploit these tendencies. There are cases of killers who, aware of their allure to certain admirers, manipulated those admirers to facilitate further crimes. For example, a female serial killer in one case study had three male admirers “in thrall” who assisted her – demonstrating that female perpetrators can also attract accomplices via hybristophilic appeal. From a criminal profiling perspective, understanding hybristophilia is useful in anticipating a notorious offender’s social support. Profilers and investigators might consider whether a fugitive killer has a fan or romantic partner who could harbor them or aid in escape. Indeed, law enforcement has to be mindful that dangerous inmates sometimes receive help from enamored pen-pals or even prison staff who develop feelings. A tragic illustration is the 2015 case of prison employee Joyce Mitchell, who helped two convicted murderers escape in New York after becoming emotionally involved with them – a scenario fueled by the kind of attraction and manipulation dynamics seen in hybristophilia (though Mitchell’s case also involved coercion). In terms of victimology, hybristophilia challenges the typical victim-offender narrative. The “victims” in these situations are arguably the enamored admirers themselves, who can be emotionally or even physically harmed by their relationships with criminals. Some admirers have emptied their bank accounts to support inmates or neglected their own families due to the obsession. In extreme cases, an infatuated person may put themselves in danger (for instance, going to meet a murderer in prison or private). Forensic psychologists thus sometimes evaluate hybristophiliac individuals to gauge their risk – are they merely fantasizing, or are they liable to abet criminal acts?
Legal and Trial Implications: Hybristophilia has occasionally surfaced in legal proceedings, raising unique issues. During trials, the presence of cheering or lovestruck supporters of the defendant (as seen with Bundy, or more recently with some school shooters’ court appearances) can complicate the atmosphere. It may intimidate victims’ families and potentially influence juror perceptions – for instance, a charismatic defendant receiving love letters might appear less monstrous to observers, though judges typically instruct juries to focus only on evidence. There have been instances where obsessed admirers attempt to contact or influence jurors or witnesses, which is illegal and can lead to mistrials. Additionally, some defendants have tried to leverage hybristophilia in their favor; Ted Bundy’s infamous courtroom marriage proposal was partly a stunt to humanize himself in front of the jury (portraying himself as a loving husband-to-be). In prison and post-conviction, the legal system also contends with hybristophilia. Prisons have policies about inmate mail and visitation largely because high-profile inmates can receive overwhelming attention from admirers. Officials must screen for inappropriate content and sometimes restrict contact if an admirer poses a security risk (for example, if they plan to help an inmate escape or smuggle contraband). When it comes to parole hearings, letters of support from love-struck members of the public have been noted in some cases, though they carry little weight compared to official records. Another legal angle is when a hybristophiliac individual becomes an accomplice: they are then criminally liable for any offenses they assist in. Some have attempted a legal defense of being under the “spell” or undue influence of the primary offender (akin to a cult brainwashing defense). For example, one could argue that a person’s love for a criminal was manipulated to coerce them into aiding a crime, thus reducing their culpability. Such defenses rarely succeed unless the coercion was extreme, since mere affection is not exculpatory. Nonetheless, understanding hybristophilia can provide context in cases like a getaway driver who was the gunman’s girlfriend – it might explain why she became involved, informing psychological evaluations or sentencing (perhaps steering the person toward psychiatric treatment in addition to punishment).
The criminological dimension of hybristophilia shows that this phenomenon is more than a psychological curiosity – it has real-world consequences for criminal behavior and justice. From famous serial killers who became dark celebrities with fan clubs, to lesser-known criminals who enlist love-struck helpers, hybristophilia intersects with crime at multiple points. For forensic psychologists, recognizing this pattern is crucial in both assessing individuals (e.g., an enamored accomplice) and advising on risk management (e.g., monitoring mail to an infamous inmate). These cases also set the stage for examining how society and media might fuel or respond to such disturbing attractions.
Sociocultural Influences and Media Representation
The role of society, culture, and media is pivotal in understanding why hybristophilia occurs and how it is perceived. Hybristophilia does not develop in a vacuum; it is influenced by cultural narratives about romance and danger, by the celebrity status sometimes afforded to criminals, and by the way media portrays crime. In recent decades, the rise of 24/7 news, true-crime documentaries, and online communities has shone a spotlight on criminals like never before – inadvertently creating an aura of intrigue that can spark attraction in susceptible individuals.
Media Romanticization of Criminals: Popular media has a long history of turning criminals into infamous icons. News coverage often focuses on the most sensational and charismatic aspects of offenders, sometimes glamorizing them. For example, Ted Bundy was frequently described as attractive, intelligent, and charming in media reports – aspects that filmmakers later amplified by casting a Hollywood heartthrob (actor Zac Efron) to play Bundy in the 2019 Netflix movie Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile.
This kind of portrayal can blur the line between condemning the crime and fetishizing the criminal. True crime TV series and films may humanize killers by exploring their backstories or featuring their romantic relationships, which can lead some viewers to feel sympathetic or even enamored. The proliferation of documentaries about serial killers (on platforms like Netflix or Discovery) has created what some call a “serial killer fandom.” Viewers, especially young people, might start following these cases as one would follow celebrity gossip – collecting facts, photos, and even forming crushes. Social media further intensifies this: on Tumblr, Twitter, or TikTok, there have been trending communities for notorious criminals. A striking instance was the online fandom for the Columbine High School shooters, where some teenagers shared edited pictures and love letters to the deceased shooters, expressing adoration. Similarly, the hashtag “#RichardRamirez” saw a revival on Instagram and TikTok after a Netflix documentary on the Night Stalker case; disturbingly, some comments focused on Ramirez’s bone structure or “hotness” in old court photos, downplaying the horror of his crimes. These trends illustrate how mass media and the internet can mythologize criminals, effectively casting them as dark anti-heroes in the public imagination.
Why Do People Romanticize Criminals? Several sociocultural factors drive the romanticization or defense of criminals by segments of the public. One factor is the forbidden fruit allure – the idea that being with a criminal is taboo, and taboos can be exciting. Dating an outlaw confers a sense of rebellion against society’s norms. In a way, some admirers may be less attracted to the specific individual than to what that individual represents: defiance, danger, or a life less ordinary. Especially for young people, infatuation with a criminal can be a form of vicarious rebellion. Another factor is infamy and notoriety as magnetism. Our culture often inadvertently celebrates criminals by giving them fame – their names and faces become widely known. For admirers, being connected to that fame (even by just writing letters or tweeting about them) can feel exciting. It’s a twisted parallel to how groupies idolize rock stars; in this case the “star” committed murders, but the star treatment (fan mail, merchandise, fan clubs) can look oddly similar. There is also the rescuer narrative: many hybristophiles believe they see the “real” person behind the criminal and want to redeem them. They might insist the killer is “misunderstood”, “broken, but not evil”, or that “their love can change them.” This narrative is reinforced by popular culture tropes of beauty taming the beast or the good woman reforming the bad man. Moreover, some fans simply deny the criminal’s guilt – despite convictions, they might obsessively consume conspiracy theories or alternative explanations to convince themselves their idol is innocent or justified. This was seen in the case of Charles Manson, where even decades later, some followers claimed he never directly killed anyone and was framed or over-vilified by the system, which helped them maintain an idealized image of him.
True Crime Fandom and Online Communities: The internet has enabled those with hybristophilic interests to find each other and form communities, which can reinforce their beliefs. On forums or social media groups dedicated to infamous crimes, one can find threads that discuss criminals in a romantic or sexualized manner – sharing prison photos, dissecting their love life, and sometimes disparaging the victims to defend the criminal. These echo-chambers normalize hybristophilia to an extent. A person who might have felt alone in being attracted to a killer can easily locate dozens of others who share that attraction, which validates and strengthens their feelings. Psychologically, group belonging may intensify one’s stance, leading to more extreme defense of the criminal (“If others feel the same way, we must be right or at least we’re not crazy”). Social media also allows direct interaction: people publicly post messages to jailed criminals, celebrate their birthdays, etc., blurring the lines between fandom and personal relationship. The term “prison groupie” is often used pejoratively in society, yet within those communities it can be a badge of honor. There is also an element of competition among some admirers – who can get a letter back from the killer, who might actually visit them, etc., which gamifies the attraction. Sociologically, this can be viewed as a subculture with its own norms and values that starkly contradict mainstream morality.
Impact of Media on Public Perception: The media’s role in shaping public perception of hybristophilia itself is noteworthy. Generally, when stories surface about people who love killers, they are met with widespread bafflement or outrage. Documentaries and talk shows have interviewed hybristophiles (for example, featuring women who married inmates) often with an undertone of judgment or sensationalism. These portrayals can swing between mocking these individuals as obsessed oddities, and painting them as tragic, romance-blinded figures. Either way, the media coverage of hybristophilia feeds back into the phenomenon: it publicizes the idea that someone like a serial killer can have romantic fans. This knowledge might encourage other vulnerable individuals to follow suit, thinking “If others did it, I can too.” On the other hand, increased awareness has also led to critical discussions about ethics in true crime media. Critics argue that dramatizations like the Bundy film risk inspiring hybristophilic attitudes by focusing too much on the killer’s charm.
In response, some creators now try to center victims’ stories instead of glorifying perpetrators. Nevertheless, the fascination with criminals remains a staple in entertainment, and as long as these figures are given the limelight, there is the potential for certain viewers to develop unhealthy attractions. In essence, mass media acts as a double-edged sword: it educates the public about crime, but it can also inadvertently seduce a segment of that public into a disturbing form of admiration.
In conclusion, sociocultural influences – especially the glamorization of criminals in popular culture and the connectivity of the internet – play a significant part in hybristophilia. The phenomenon is fueled not just by individual psychology but by the narratives and communities that allow attraction to criminals to take root and flourish. Understanding this context is crucial for addressing hybristophilia, as it highlights that any intervention or prevention would need to consider media practices and cultural attitudes, not solely individual pathology.
Ethical and Legal Considerations
Hybristophilia raises several ethical and legal questions for society, mental health professionals, and the criminal justice system. While having an attraction to a criminal is not a crime in itself, the phenomenon challenges our notions of morality in relationships and poses potential risks that authorities must manage. This section examines the key concerns, from the ethical implications of media and professional responses to the legal outcomes of hybristophilic behavior.
Exploitation and Vulnerability: A primary ethical concern is the potential exploitation of hybristophilic individuals. Many of those who fall in love with criminals are vulnerable – they may be emotionally fragile, previously traumatized, or socially isolated. Entering a relationship with a convicted violent offender (especially one in prison) often creates a power imbalance. The inmate may manipulate the admirer for money, advocacy, or even assistance in crimes, taking advantage of their devotion. Ethically, we must ask: Are these admirers capable of giving informed consent to such a relationship, or are they being psychologically coerced? Prisoners have coerced lovestruck pen-pals into smuggling drugs, financing appeals, or other risky acts. The dual victimization concept arises – the criminal’s initial victims suffered from the crimes, and now the admirer may become another kind of victim (emotionally or financially used). Mental health professionals who encounter clients with hybristophilic tendencies face an ethical balancing act: respecting the client’s autonomy in romance, while also recognizing the potential for harm. Another facet is that these relationships can become abusive. An incarcerated criminal might still emotionally abuse or threaten an admirer (through letters or monitored visits), or if the criminal is not imprisoned (e.g. someone attracted to a violent gang member who is free), the risk of direct harm is acute. Ethically, society has an interest in preventing individuals from entering dangerous relationships, but this runs up against personal freedom in choosing one’s partner. There have been suggestions that prisons should screen and perhaps limit inmates’ contact with known vulnerable individuals, but denying correspondence raises its own ethical issues regarding inmates’ rights and free association.
Media and Ethical Responsibility: The media’s handling of hybristophilia also involves ethical questions. Sensationalizing cases of people who love killers can border on voyeurism and may unintentionally glamorize the behavior. Ethically responsible journalism would treat these cases with nuance and avoid romantic clichés. Similarly, filmmakers and authors producing true crime content carry a responsibility in how they portray criminals. The ethical critique is that by focusing on a murderer’s “fan club” or romantic appeal, media might encourage copycat admirers or trivialize the suffering of victims. On the other hand, ignoring the phenomenon could mean missing an opportunity to educate the public about its dangers. The ethics of privacy also come into play: individuals who publicly love criminals (e.g., marrying a killer) sometimes find themselves hounded by press or online harassment. They become targets of scorn and even death threats, as people accuse them of disrespecting victims or being “evil” themselves. From an ethical standpoint, while one can vehemently disagree with a hybristophile’s choices, it is not acceptable for the public to threaten or abuse them; two wrongs don’t make a right. The stigma attached to hybristophilia is so strong that it can lead to severe social isolation for those individuals (loss of jobs, estrangement from family), raising compassion concerns.
Legal System Responses: Legally, as mentioned, simply experiencing hybristophilia is not a crime – thoughts and feelings are not illegal. However, when those thoughts translate into actions, the law becomes involved. One obvious legal area is when hybristophiles commit crimes (or assist in them) due to their attraction. In such cases, they are prosecuted like anyone else, but sometimes courts do consider their psychological state. For instance, if a defendant argues they participated in a crime out of blind love or duress from their criminal partner, a judge might order a psychological evaluation. While “hybristophilia” itself is not a defense, evidence of being under undue influence or having a diminished capacity to resist a dominant partner could potentially be a mitigating factor in sentencing (similar to how cult involvement might be considered). Another legal aspect is marriage to incarcerated criminals. Many jurisdictions allow prisoners to marry pen-pals or admirers. This raises questions about whether such marriages are truly consensual and in the best interest of the admirer, but legally, adults have the right to marry whomever they choose (barring certain restrictions). There have been rare calls to more strictly regulate inmate marriages when it appears someone is being preyed upon, but this is difficult to enforce without infringing on civil liberties. Additionally, consider the case of professional ethics turned legal: for example, if a prison staff member or therapist develops hybristophilic feelings for a criminal they supervise, acting on it is not only unethical but also often illegal (as it violates professional conduct laws and can be considered sexual misconduct or aiding/abetting). Cases of prison guards or counselors who cross the line have resulted in criminal charges – highlighting how hybristophilia can entangle with laws about abuse of power.
Protecting Society and Individuals: From a public safety perspective, a concern is that hybristophilia might enable criminals to continue harmful behavior. For instance, a serial killer with devoted fans might incite one of them to violence, essentially extending his criminal reach outside prison walls. Law enforcement agencies have to remain vigilant about such possibilities. Some analysts have even suggested that infamous criminals should be media-restricted (not given interviews or platforms) to avoid creating cults of personality that fuel hybristophilia. This suggestion treads on free speech issues, but it underscores the perceived risk of giving criminals too much exposure. In terms of protecting the hybristophiles themselves, legal tools like restraining orders could theoretically be used if a particular inmate is manipulating or threatening an admirer. However, it is more common for families of hybristophiles to intervene informally (through counseling or persuasion) rather than courts issuing orders to stop a consensual correspondence. An ethical duty exists for mental health and legal professionals to educate those entranced by criminals about the reality of their situation – that their idolized partner is dangerous and possibly exploiting them. Some prisons offer volunteer orientation or literature to those who correspond with notorious inmates, effectively warning them about inmates’ manipulative tactics.
The ethical and legal considerations surrounding hybristophilia revolve around balancing individual freedoms with protection from harm. Ethically, there is a call for compassionate yet cautious handling of hybristophilia – avoiding shaming individuals while not endorsing the behavior. Legally, intervention is limited unless a law is broken, but understanding this phenomenon can inform policies (like prison correspondence rules or sentencing of co-offenders). Ultimately, hybristophilia challenges us to consider how far society should go in safeguarding people from their own dangerous desires and what responsibility media and institutions have in not fostering those desires.
Treatment and Psychological Interventions
A critical question is whether hybristophilia should be considered a clinical issue requiring treatment, and if so, how mental health professionals might intervene. Because hybristophilia is not an officially recognized disorder in diagnostic manuals like the DSM-5, there are no standardized treatment protocols specifically for it. However, when an individual’s attraction to criminals causes them distress or leads to harmful consequences (such as entering abusive relationships or engaging in criminal acts), psychological intervention can be beneficial. Therapists and researchers often draw from approaches used for other atypical sexual interests or for relationship-oriented problems.
Is Hybristophilia a Disorder? Firstly, it’s important to note that the psychiatric community has debated whether hybristophilia constitutes a true paraphilic disorder or simply a rare fetish/interest. The DSM-5 criteria for a paraphilic disorder require that an atypical sexual interest cause significant distress or impairment, or involve harming others. In many hybristophilia cases, the individual may not feel distress – in fact, they often feel elated or in love – and they may not be directly harming others (though there is arguably indirect harm in supporting criminals). Because of this, many hybristophiles do not seek therapy on their own, and clinicians typically only see them when a problem has occurred (e.g., they got in trouble due to their obsession). Some scholars caution against pathologizing every instance of hybristophilia. A person who writes love letters to a prisoner might be making a questionable life choice but not necessarily suffering from a mental illness. That said, extreme cases, especially those overlapping with other issues (trauma, depression, etc.), can warrant treatment.
Therapeutic Approaches: In cases where intervention is needed or sought, therapists adapt techniques from treating other maladaptive attractions or paraphilias. One common approach is Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT). CBT would help a hybristophiliac client examine and challenge their thoughts about the criminal lover. For example, therapy would address cognitive distortions like “He’s misunderstood, only I see his good side” or “My love can change him”. The therapist works to replace these with more realistic appraisals (“He is manipulating me,” “His violence is not excusable,” “I deserve a safe relationship”). CBT can also target the association between danger and arousal, attempting to break that link through cognitive reframing and gradual exposure to healthy relationship dynamics. Psychoeducation is another key element – educating the individual on the psychological tactics many psychopathically inclined criminals use to lure and exploit (charm, love-bombing, etc.) can help pierce the illusion. By learning about cases of other women who were hurt or deceived by offenders, the client may start to doubt the fantasy they’ve built up.
For those whose hybristophilia has a strong sexual component (i.e., they only become aroused by the idea of criminals or violent acts), clinicians might employ techniques used in paraphilia treatment. One such technique is orgasmic reconditioning. This involves having the person masturbate to their usual criminal fantasy until near orgasm, then consciously switch thoughts to a more appropriate or non-criminal fantasy at the moment of climax. Over time, this can retrain arousal patterns to associate with non-deviant imagery. Another technique could be aversion therapy, though it’s less commonly used now due to ethical considerations – for instance, pairing thoughts of the criminal with an unpleasant stimulus (like a bad odor or a snap of a rubber band on the wrist) to reduce their erotic appeal. A more modern and gentle approach is imaginal exposure with response prevention, where the client vividly imagines scenarios involving the criminal lover but is guided to refrain from the usual pleasurable response, thus learning to tolerate the scenario without excitement.
Group Therapy and Support: Given that many hybristophiles feel isolated or judged, group therapy or support groups can be very helpful if available. In a group setting (perhaps combined with others who have experienced abusive relationships or have atypical attractions), individuals can share their stories without fear of ridicule and learn from others. Hearing a peer recount how loving a prisoner led to heartbreak or danger could resonate more than a therapist’s warnings. Group sessions can also reinforce accountability – members might challenge each other’s rationalizations (e.g., “Are you sure he’s changed? Mine said all the same things and then I found out he was lying.”). There have been informal support networks online, but those can be double-edged (some might reinforce the attraction). A professionally guided group would aim to provide empathy but also gently confront unhealthy behaviors.
Addressing Underlying Issues: Often, treating hybristophilia effectively means addressing underlying psychological issues that fuel it. If the person has unresolved trauma (e.g., a history of abuse) leading them to gravitate to dangerous partners, therapies like trauma-focused cognitive therapy or psychodynamic therapy might be used to work through those past wounds. If low self-esteem or loneliness is a driver, then building the person’s self-worth and social support system is crucial. For example, therapy might involve assertiveness training and involvement in new social activities to show the person they have options outside of the criminal relationship. In some cases, hybristophilia might overlap with what’s known as dependency or love addiction. Here, techniques from addiction therapy (like 12-step programs adapted for love/relationship addiction) can help, teaching individuals to break the compulsion of needing contact with the object of their affection.
Medication: There is no medication to “cure” hybristophilia specifically, but if the individual has co-occurring mental health issues, pharmacotherapy can be adjunctive. For instance, if someone’s obsession with a criminal is part of an obsessive-compulsive pattern or is causing severe anxiety, SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors) might be prescribed to help reduce obsessive thoughts and stabilize mood. In extreme sexual paraphilia cases, anti-androgen drugs (which reduce sex drive) have been used – but these would only be considered if the person is at risk of illegal sexual behavior, which typically isn’t the case for hybristophilia (since the acts are often limited to letter-writing or consensual sex with an inmate spouse). Thus, medication is more relevant if there’s depression, PTSD, or anxiety in the mix.
Prognosis and Challenges: Treating hybristophilia can be challenging. One reason is that the individual often does not want to change – they are in love, and may be defensive of that love. Motivational interviewing techniques can help here, sensitively exploring the pros and cons of the relationship without outright denouncing it at first. Success in intervention is more likely if the person has faced negative consequences (e.g., the criminal lover betrayed them or legal trouble ensued), as they may then be open to seeing the downsides. Another challenge is maintaining change: even if someone agrees to stop contacting a criminal and build a new life, the emotional attachment can be very strong and relapses (resuming correspondence or starting up with a new inmate) can occur, especially if the underlying needs (for excitement, for love, for purpose) aren’t fulfilled elsewhere. Follow-up support over the long term may be needed.
It’s worth noting that because hybristophilia is so niche, there is little research on specific therapy outcomes. Most recommendations are extrapolated from related areas of treatment in forensic psychology and sex therapy. Some case reports indicate that with persistent therapy, individuals can come to recognize the reality of their situation and disengage from the unhealthy attraction. Even if the sexual fascination doesn’t disappear overnight, clients can learn to refrain from acting on it and seek more appropriate relationships. In summary, while there is no simple “cure” for hybristophilia, a combination of cognitive-behavioral strategies, support for underlying issues, and education can guide those affected toward healthier patterns, should they be willing to change.
Conclusion
Hybristophilia is a striking example of how human attraction can manifest in extreme and counterintuitive ways. Through this exploration, we have seen that the phenomenon cannot be reduced to a single cause or discipline – it is truly multifaceted. Psychologically, hybristophilia intertwines concepts of attachment, trauma, personality, and conditioning, illustrating how early experiences and cognitive associations (like linking danger with love) can shape one’s romantic desires. From a forensic perspective, the phenomenon has tangible impacts, as evidenced by famous cases where admirers became spouses or accomplices to criminals. These cases underscore important principles in criminology and victimology, reminding us that the ripple effects of crime often extend beyond the immediate offense to entangle admirers and the public imagination. Socioculturally, hybristophilia forces us to reflect on the role of media and culture in constructing the allure of the outlaw – the fact that serial killers can achieve a form of twisted celebrity says as much about societal fascinations as it does about individual psychology. The media’s power to romanticize or demonize influences whether hybristophilia is fueled or discouraged in the public sphere.
The broader implications for forensic psychology include better awareness and training around this topic. Law enforcement officers, lawyers, and psychologists who work with offenders should be cognizant that offenders can attract and exploit admirers. This awareness can improve risk assessment (for instance, identifying if an inmate has an overly devoted correspondent who might need a reality check or even security monitoring). It can also inform victim support services – recognizing that the “victims” of a charismatic offender might include not just those they directly harmed, but those they manipulate emotionally from afar. For the mental health field, hybristophilia presents a challenge of distinguishing between unusual but harmless fantasies and those attachments that pose a danger to the client or society. As we discussed, while not an official disorder, hybristophilia in its severe form may warrant therapeutic intervention, and increased understanding of it can help clinicians guide clients caught in these destructive attractions.
This article also highlights areas ripe for future research. Empirical data on hybristophilia is scarce. Future studies could examine the prevalence of hybristophilic fantasies in the general population (perhaps many people have a mild attraction to “bad boys/girls” that never goes to the extreme). Longitudinal studies on individuals who marry or correspond with violent offenders could provide insight into their psychology and whether interventions could alter their path. Additionally, research into the role of social media – for example, analyzing forums where people discuss crushes on criminals – could shed light on how group dynamics reinforce these feelings. From a neuroscience angle, it would be fascinating to see if the brains of hybristophiliac individuals respond to crime-related stimuli differently (do they show activation in reward centers when seeing a mugshot of a murderer they find attractive?). Such studies would deepen our understanding and perhaps help tailor more effective interventions.
In closing, hybristophilia sits at an uncomfortable crossroads of love and violence, intimacy and infamy. It reminds us that the human heart (and mind) can find desire in the darkest of places. By studying this phenomenon through a rigorous, scholarly lens, we not only learn about a peculiar form of attraction but also gain insight into fundamental questions: What do we seek in a partner? How does society shape our desires? And how can dangerous liaisons be prevented or redirected toward healthier outcomes? An increased understanding of hybristophilia can aid professionals in psychology and criminal justice to navigate these questions. It can encourage media creators to be mindful of the fine line between informing and glamorizing. Ultimately, shining a light on hybristophilia – rather than merely sensationalizing it – allows for a more compassionate and nuanced approach to those affected, aiming to ensure that fascination with “the beast” does not lead beauty (or anyone) into destruction.
References
APA Dictionary of Psychology. (n.d.). Hybristophilia. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. (Definition of hybristophilia as sexual interest in those who commit crimes).
Money, J. (1986). Lovemaps: Clinical Concepts of Sexual/Erotic Health and Paraphilia. New York: Irvington. (Originated the term hybristophilia, describing it as a predatory paraphilia).
Vitello, C. (2006). Hybristophilia: The love of criminals. In E. W. Hickey (Ed.), Sex Crimes and Paraphilia (pp. 127–144). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. (Review of hybristophilia, noting prevalence in women and links to low self-esteem and abuse history).
Pasquarelli, D., Mastronardi, V. M., & Calderaro, M. (2021). Hybristophilia: “cause mama I’m in love with a criminal”. Rivista di Psicopatologia Forense, Medicina Legale, Criminologia, 26(1-2-3), 1–10. (Analysis of social media fan behavior toward a murderer, introducing hybristophilia as the explanatory term).
Pettigrew, M. (2019). Aggressive hybristophilia in men and the affect of a female serial killer. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 30(3), 419–428. (Case report of male hybristophiles influenced by a female serial murderer, illustrating that hybristophilia can occur in men).
Isenberg, S. (1991/2000). Women Who Love Men Who Kill. New York: Simon & Schuster (reprint by BackinPrint.com). (Seminal book based on interviews with women who fell in love with incarcerated killers, exploring their psychology and experiences).
Griffiths, M. (2012, April 25). A crime of passion: A beginner’s guide to hybristophilia. Dr. Mark Griffiths’ Blog. Retrieved from https://drmarkgriffiths.wordpress.com/ (Overview of hybristophilia, including definitions, typologies, and speculative motivations, by a psychology professor).
Investigative Psychiatry. (2024, April 14). Hybristophilia: Understanding attraction to prisoners – beyond the sexual realm. Retrieved from https://investigativepsychiatry.com (Discusses the concept’s evolution, critiques of pathologizing it, and emphasizes caution given lack of DSM recognition).
Mentes Abiertas Psicología. (2023). Hybristophilia: Attraction to dangerous people. Retrieved from https://mentesabiertaspsicologia.com (Explains hybristophilia in lay terms, covering causes like excitement-seeking and trauma, and suggesting therapy approaches such as CBT and behavior modification).
Terranova, K. (2020). Fear and attraction: Analyzing women’s responses to Ted Bundy. Journal of Research Archive (Preprint), 5(1), 10–15. (Study suggesting that fear can heighten attraction via excitation transfer, with survey data on perceptions of Ted Bundy’s charisma influenced by media)
Know someone who would be interested in reading Hybristophilia: The Psychology Behind Attraction to Criminals.
Share This Page With Them.
Go From "Hybristophilia: The Psychology Behind Attraction to Criminals" Back To The Home Page